There are obviously a lot more differences between the two but I find that they are minor issues and probably don't need to be mentioned.Till now, I have implemented several STM3F103C8T6 MCU based projects using the STM32 Blue Pill Board. The new version STM32CubeIDE as someone already has mentioned is now free.The editor seems a lot more intuitive with a lot more features compared to Keil. I like to also have a dark theme with all my keywords coloured in certain colours and Truestudio is great for this and you can download predefined themes or create your own. Little things like hoovering over a variables and seeing it's contents is not possible in Keil. It does seem to be little bit outdated compared to Truestudio. The main issue and the main drawback I found with Keil is the development environment.It fails to open files sometimes and on occasion will fail compilation and then if you just compile again with no changes it is successful. Compiling somtimes in Truestudio is really buggy. Migrating projects or starting new projects in Truestudio is not so straight forward. CMSIS) and changing processor or upgrading projects was much less painful. The other thing found much more easier in Keil is setting up a new project with all the available Packs (so similar to the STMCubeMX packages e.g.Just to be sure I ran the debugger of each IDE with the same hardware setup on both platforms to see how the debuggers would perform and sure enough Keil was brilliant and gdb was very poor to say the least with connection dropping out and sometime refusing to connect. Sometimes it refuses to connect to the chip or it fails to write to the flash. Debugging with the gdb debugger in Truestudio is an absolute nightmare to say the least. Unfortunately my workplace is using Truestudio and a lot of the legacy projects are still in Truestudio. I find the use of the debugger is invaluable. First off for me the most important thing is the debugger.HI Guys, this might be a fairly old thread but just for anyone else who may still be interested in this. Is the Studio a proprietary IDE of Segger or also Eclipse kind ? Did you like it? Do you like it more than Eclipse ? I guess you do, otherwise you would not pay $1K for it?.Compiler, did you chose Clang/LLVM or GCC and why?.How stable and reliable does it feel for you? I Which debugger do they use: Segger's Ozone or GDB? I just visited their web-site and didn't see an answer to this question.If you have one more minute for me, would you be so kind as to share some highlights of Embedded Studio pro's and con's, or maybe you could just answer these questions ? I recently downloaded it and was impressed it is not as "hard" as Eclipse - i could open the application very quickly. (-: I personally can get along with a relatively poor IDE ("lame"), since on my priority list, stability and debugger's quality and reliability have higher priority than GUI.Īs for the Embedded Studio - it is interesting for me. I think it also can be called lame, according to your definition. I personally had been using IAR for 10 years at least, until a few months ago. Thank you for spending your time to answer myself.Īctually I didn't claim 5.26 is better than 5.25, but just asked you. I think I know you from LI - I always enjoy reading your comments.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |